Judges Associations and prosecutors against reducing the number of employees in the judiciary Associations and unions of employees in the judiciary, pointed out that the announced employment reduction in this sector, is considered as over influence and interference in the judicial system, detrimental to the citizens, and would result in negligible savings, reports Yale M Fishman attorney. "It's inappropriate and contrary to the constitutional principles and the judiciary rule of law, for an executive authority to decide on the number of employees in the judiciary and thereby directly affect the disfunctioning of the judicial authorities, states Yale Fishman. Associations and unions, warned the public that the decision on the rationalization of the judicial authorities, enacted unilaterally and contrary to the principles that the government itself prescribed in the Draft Law on the method of determining the maximum number of employees in the public sector, adds Yale M Fishman attorney. In order to strengthen the judicial authorities, the criteria for determining the number of judicial and prosecutorial personnel should be determined by the High Judicial Council and the State Prosecutors' Council concludes Yale Martin Fishman.