The Chronicle of Higher Education - In India, Caste Discrimination Still Plagues University Campuses lyrics

December 11, 2001 In February, 20-year-old Manish Kumar climbed to the roof of a five-story building at the elite Indian Institute of Technology in Roorkee and jumped to his d**h. The engineering major was a member of India's undercla**, formerly known as "untouchables." And that, says his father, was what drove him to commit suicide. From the day he set foot on campus, "his cla**mates would taunt him, saying, 'You can never become an engineer—you are only here because of quotas,'" says Rajinder Kumar, from his home in the northern Indian city of Kanpur. "Every time we met him, he would look depressed, and he initially didn't tell us why. One day, finally, he phoned and said he was being tormented by his cla**mates and he couldn't study because of that." Caste-based discrimination has been illegal since the creation of India's first Constitution, in 1950. To eliminate centuries-old persecution of Hinduism's outcasts, considered so unclean as to be untouchable, the Constitution made it a criminal offense to engage in practices common at the time, including refusing untouchables entry to temples, serving them from separate cups and plates, refusing to rent them homes, and denying them access to education. The government also set aside more than one-fifth of places in public colleges and in government jobs for this group of around 200 million people, which the Constitution renamed the Scheduled Castes. Today members of the Scheduled Castes have emerged as a potent political force. They call themselves Dalits, a Sanskrit word meaning "ground down beyond recognition." But as Manish Kumar's suicide suggests, thousands of years of prejudice are not so easily erased. Of 441,424 registered crimes against Dalits and indigenous people from 1995 to 2007, as many as 10,512 were cases in which upper castes perpetuated some of the old "untouchability" practices, according to the National Coalition for Strengthening the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Even recently there have been incidents—mostly in rural areas, where Dalits are less able to blend in—of people being forced to consume feces, or lynched because they dared to get water from a well not designated for their use. Sometimes they are attacked for seeming to show off by riding a motorbike or by talking on a cellphone. Disturbingly, caste discrimination is pervasive in India's universities as well, say many Dalit students and teachers, as well as social scientists, academics, and observers who study issues of cla** and caste. In the most egregious cases, Dalit students and their supporters say, upper-caste students beat up Dalits for no given reason; professors ignore questions from Dalit students in cla**; upper-caste students, with the complicity of professors, ostracize their Dalit peers or force them out of university housing; and professors compel students to reveal their caste publicly, and then give Dalits lower grades. No national studies have been done to determine the magnitude of caste-related discrimination on campuses. But according to the Insight Foundation, a Dalit activist group, discrimination and verbal and physical abuse have led to at least 18 suicides by Dalit students over the past four years. Anoop Kumar, founder of the Insight Foundation, says those 18 suicides reflect only those cases in which parents have come forward to complain. In many more cases, parents are reluctant to speak out. He fears that despite the gains that Dalits have made politically, the climate on campuses has actually gotten worse as they have begun speaking up more, and the competition for university placements has grown more fierce. At the root of much of the animosity driving caste tensions on campuses is the quota system, or reservations, as they are often called. Shiv Visvanathan, a sociologist who has written about religion and Dalit issues in India, says reservations have created a barrier of prejudice, especially given the competition in India for admission to universities. That has entrenched existing stereotypes about Dalits, who many feel "aren't fit to join university and then not fit to study and basically should not be treated as citizens." Those opposed to quotas argue that after India's 64 years of independence, set-asides have outlived their original purpose. Dalits, they argue, have risen enough on the socioeconomic ladder to be able to compete against their peers on a level playing field. Many opponents of quotas believe that the system allows academically weaker students to get in, when merit should be the sole basis of admission. "Obviously they are weak [academically]. That's why they are taking the benefit of reservations," says Kaushal Kant Mishra, a founding member of a group called Youth for Equality, which campaigns against the use of quotas. Dr. Mishra says that while he agrees that Dalits have been discriminated against in the past, it is wrong to relax admissions standards in an attempt to redress those injustices. The perception among many opponents of quotas is that there is a significant difference in admissions standards between students who qualify for quotas and those who don't. Yet the difference is actually quite narrow, with a relaxation of between 5 percent and 10 percent of grades on either college-entrance examinations or high-school exit exams. "It isn't as if we can get zero marks and get in," says Ajay Kumar Singh, who studied at Aiims, and has formed a group called Progressive Medicos Forum, which seeks to bring to light caste discrimination in medical colleges. Students who benefit from the quota system often find that it is used against them once they are on campus. Many institutions post lists of new students that include their scores and the category under which they were admitted: general or scheduled caste. This ensures that everyone—students, administrators, and professors—knows who the Dalits are. The differentiation, and sometimes overt segregation, continues in other ways. Dr. Singh says that most Dalit students at Aiims were housed in separate dorms. He was placed in a dorm where he was the only Dalit, which created its own problems. Students "used to bolt my dormitory room door from outside and write on the door that no one likes me, and I should change to another dormitory," recalls Dr. Singh. It is difficult, of course, to determine whether Dalit students are targeted because of their caste or because they simply misinterpret why they received poor grades or treatment. However, on politically active campuses like Jawaharlal Nehru University, Dalit students have been able to produce some evidence suggesting that discrimination exists. A petition last year by students at the university, using India's Right to Information Act, showed that many Dalit students who scored well in their written exams, on which students are identified only by a number, received extremely low scores in the oral exams. Discrimination "is that blatant," says Ashwini Shelke, a sociology student at the university who is a member of the United Dalits Student Forum, a group that brings attention to issues faced by Dalits. Dalit students also seem to fare worse than their peers in college. In 2007 the Progressive Medicos and Scientists Forum conducted a survey and found that student-failure rates at Aiims, the medical school, were 60 to 70 percent for Dalit and Scheduled Tribe students, while for nonquota students, the rates were under 10 percent. At the Indian Institutes of Technology, says Mr. Kumar, of the Insight Foundation, the annual Dalit dropout rate is 25 percent. Whether this is the result of prejudice or other factors—such as weaker academic preparation—is difficult to know. University administrators have also not seemed to take many overt steps to deal with possible discrimination on their campuses or tensions around the issue of quotas. In 2008, Senthilkumar, a Dalit physics scholar pursuing his doctoral degree at the University of Hyderabad, k**ed himself on campus because no professor was willing to be his doctoral guide, say Dalit activists and some academics there. A university spokesman says an investigation turned up nothing incriminating. "No evidence was found in any of the schools for systematic or deliberate discrimination against students on the basis of caste, although problems in administering the Ph.D. programs have given rise to such apprehensions among students," wrote Ashish Thomas, a university spokesman, in an e-mail response to a question about Mr. Senthilkumar's case. P. Thirumal, head of the department of communication at Hyderabad, says the situation is not so simple. "There have been [discrimination] cases I have heard of from students," he says, emphasizing that his views do not necessarily represent the university's. When society is the way it is, it's too ambitious to expect professors to transcend its behavior, he says. "By and large, caste discrimination is an affliction, a collective one," he adds. There are some small signs of change. After lobbying efforts by the Insight Foundation and other Dalit advocacy groups, in July the country's university regulator ordered hundreds of institutions to take strong steps to prevent caste discrimination. An unnamed official told an Indian newspaper that the number of Dalit students committing suicide "is shocking enough for us" to take such action. Anoop Kumar says the university regulator's order has been posted on bulletin boards on university campuses. One thing many Dalit students don't want to change is the quota system itself. "Yes, the quota identifies you as a Scheduled Caste student, so the chances of discrimination are high," says Ms. Shelke, of the United Dalits Student Forum. "But if there is no quota, we wouldn't even get in, because discrimination is so huge, right from [elementary] school." She and other advocates hope that more Dalit students feel comfortable speaking up for themselves, and that universities take a more active part in breaking down longtime social prejudices. "We have to get universities to break the ice between communities," says Mr. Visvanathan, the sociologist. "We need imaginative faculty. I see [the current situation] as a failure of imagination." http://chronicle.com/article/In-India-Caste-Discrimination/130061/ [Note: This is an excerpt. Some paragraph breaks have been changed for ease of reading.]